Categories
Nursing

Discussion 1 Assessment Descriiption Complete all of the following for your disc

Discussion 1
Assessment Descriiption
Complete all of the following for your discussion response.
1. Immunity is necessary to prevent infectious diseases from spreading. Differentiate between passive-acquired and active-acquired immunity. Provide two examples of each type of immunity.
2. Immunoglobulins are necessary to protect the human physiology from diseases and pathological disorders. Explain the role of IgA, IgG, IgE, IgD, and IgM.
3. Stress is a component that affects the normal regulations of human physiology. Neuroendocrine regulation is important in this abnormality. How does increased catecholamine and cortisol affect the immune system?
Discussion 2
Assessment Descriiption
Answer both of the following discussion questions
1. Explain the differences between innate and adaptive immunity.
Explain the differences between the primary and secondary line of defense. What factors interfere with these mechanisms? How are these levels of immunity affected in a child, an elderly person, or a person with a chronic disease?
2. Explain the complement system and the roles of macrophage, dendritic cells, mast cells, neutrophils, basophils, natural killer cells, T-cells (T-helper cells, cytotoxic T-cells, memory T-cells, and T-regulatory cells), and B-cells (antibodies and memory B-cells).

Categories
Nursing

For this assessment you will develop a thorough five to seven page research plan

For this assessment you will develop a thorough five to seven page research plan based upon your work on previous assessments. The plan will be based on either qualitative or quantitative methodologies but not both. In addition to refining your previous work, you will also discuss the concepts of reliability and validity as they pertain to data collection.
Introduction
Note: The assessments in this course build upon each other. Therefore, you are strongly encouraged to complete them in the order in which they are presented.
When conducting research, it is possible to move in multiple directions rather than toward a specific focal point. These multiple directions create components of the research that do not align with one another. It is particularly a problem for novice researchers. For this final assessment, it will be critical to ensure that all parts of your submission: problem statement, purpose statement, research questions, and data collection or sampling are aligned. This review will help lead to a focused research plan, that is more likely to be successful at addressing the research question.
One important consideration is the validity and reliability of data and collection tools for a research plan. For reasons of expediency, researchers find a sample of a specific population, as it is not possible to research an entire population. In quantitative studies, statistical formulas are used to determine the number required from the sample to ensure validity of the study results. In qualitative studies, the simple rule of 12–20 participants is accepted based on the total population. They must meet the criteria outlined as specific for the study. The sample comprises individuals who can represent the total population. From the data gathered, the researcher can determine causation, correlation, or inference.
Remember, reliable data are data findings that can be repeated. In other words, the results are from the data collection are consistent across different samples and time periods. Valid data are data findings that are accurate and relevant.
Instructions
The purpose of a research plan is to provide a brief overview of the key components of a planned research study. It helps to build quality into the research process. During this course, you have, step by step, developed an abbreviated research plan contributing to a process improvement focused on decreasing the incidence of a hospital-acquired condition (HAC) of your choice. As you have progressed the course, you may have improved your ideas and revised your writing based on new information and the expertise you have gained.
To complete this final assessment, combine relevant work from your previous assessments into one seamless research plan. Be sure to incorporate any useful feedback suggested by your instructor, and be sure to properly cite all resources used to support your plan.
For this assessment it is suggested that you build upon the work that you did in the Research Problem and Purpose Statements assessment, as well as the research question and methods assessment that fits the method you chose.
This assessment has four distinct parts:
Part 1: Problem Statement
Relevant Scoring Guide Criteria:
Explain a given problem statement in the context of a research plan.
Align the separate parts of a research plan into a unified whole.
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with expectations for health care professionals.
For this section, present your revised and finalized problem statement based on your work in the Research Problem and Purpose Statements assessment.
Additionally, you will explain how the purpose statement is grounded within the context and evidence of your chosen hospital-acquired condition (HAC) and the health care setting that is being used as the basis for your research plan. Additionally, you should point out the ways in which the problem statement will help to establish the alignment of other parts of the research plan.
This section should be about one page in length.
Remember the checklist below when finalizing your problem statement:
Problem Statement Checklist
Identify the problem that led to the research.
Is it easy to determine?
Were there identifying words provided that justify the problem?
Was the rationale or justification of the problem clearly stated?
Do the words in the problem statement indicate the kind of study performed? Which words in particular?
Was the evidence for the problem provided in the literature?
Part 2: Purpose Statement
Relevant Scoring Guide Criteria:
Explain a given purpose statement in the context of a research plan.
Align the separate parts of a research plan into a unified whole.
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with expectations for health care professionals.
For this section, present your revised and finalized purpose statement based on your work in the Research Problem and Purpose Statements assessment.
Additionally, you will explain how the purpose statement is grounded within the context and evidence of your chosen hospital-acquired condition (HAC) and the health care setting that is being used as the basis for your research plan. Additionally, you should point out the ways in which the purpose statement is aligned with you problem statement, as well as how it will help inform an aligned methodological choice for other parts of the research plan.
This section should be one to two pages in length.
Remember to use the checklist below when finalizing your purpose statement:
Purpose Statement Checklist
Identify the purpose that led to the research study.
What does the study hope to accomplish? What are the desired outcomes?
Was the rationale or justification of the purpose clearly stated?
Do the words in the purpose statement indicate the kind of study performed? What words in particular?
Was the item cited as evidence for the purpose published within the last five years?
Part 3: Research Question
Relevant Scoring Guide Criteria:
Explain a given research question in the context of a research plan.
Align the separate parts of a research plan into a unified whole.
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with expectations for health care professionals.
For this section, present your revised and finalized research question. This research question should be based on your work in either the Qualitative Research Questions and Methods or the Quantitative Research Questions and Methods assessment.
Additionally, you will explain how the research question is grounded within the context and evidence of your chosen hospital-acquired condition (HAC) and the health care setting that is being used as the basis for your research plan. Additionally, you should point out the ways in which the research question is aligned to the purpose of your research plan, as well as how answering it will help to address your research problem. You should also comment on the ways in which the research question helps to provide a guide to which data collection methods can be aligned.
This section should be one to two pages in length.
Depending on your chosen methodology, the checklists below could be useful:
Qualitative Research Question Checklist
Does the purpose statement fit logically with the problem statement? Are there similar words or does it seem to address a different topic?
Do the research questions align with the method and design of the study? For instance, are words like perception used that would automatically reject a quantitative study?
Do questions seek to describe responses to the variables described in the study?
Do the questions begin with the word why?
Do the questions focus on a single phenomenon?
Do the questions include exploratory verbs?
Is the language nondirectional?
Are the questions open ended?
Do the questions specify the participants and research site?
Quantitative Research Question Checklist
Does the purpose statement fit logically with the problem statement? Are there similar words or does it seem to address a different topic?
Based on the problem statement, do the research questions align with the method and design of the study? Do questions seek to describe responses to the variables described in the study?
Do the questions include words like compare, correlate, or other words that indicate a quantitative study?
Do the questions include identification of the independent and dependent variables?
Does the hypothesis fit with the research questions?
Do the questions and hypothesis identify the participants for the research study?
Do the questions and hypothesis specify the participants and the research site?
Part 4: Data Collection, Reliability, and Validity
Relevant Scoring Guide Criteria:
Explain a chosen data collection method in the context of a research plan.
Describe a contextually valid data collection method.
Explain contextual measurement reliability and validity.
Align the separate parts of a research plan into a unified whole.
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with expectations for health care professionals.
For this section you will start by building upon the data collection methods, tools, and strategies from your work in either the Qualitative Research Questions and Methods or the Quantitative Research Questions and Methods assessment. Make sure you use the data collection considerations that match the methodology of your research question.
In this section you will describe the ways in which your data collection methods will be valid within the context of your chosen HAC and health care setting, as well as your choice of methodology. Additionally, you will explain how the measurements that your chosen collection methods will produce are reliable and valid. Lastly, you will comment on how the data collection methods are aligned in such a way that they will produce information that will help to answer the research question and create an opportunity to address the research purpose and problem.
Additional Submission Requirements
Structure: Include a title page, table of contents, and reference page.
Length: There is not length requirement for this assessment. Most submissions that fully address all scoring guide criteria will be 5 to 7 pages in length.
References: Cite at least five current scholarly or professional resources.
Format: Use APA style for references and citations.
You may wish to refer to the following APA resources to help with your structure, formatting, and style:
Evidence and APA.
APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX].
Font: Times New Roman font, 12 point, double-spaced for narrative portions only.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Explain the different types of health care research methodologies.
Explain a chosen data collection method in the context of a research plan.
Describe a contextually valid data collection method.
Competency 2: Develop a research question based on a hospital-acquired condition.
Explain a given research problem in the context of a research plan.
Explain a given purpose statement in the context of a research plan.
Explain a given research question in the context of a research plan.
Competency 3: Plan a research project.
Explain contextual measurement reliability and validity.
Align the separate parts of a research plan into a unified whole.
Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with the expectations of health care professionals.
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with expectations for health care professionals.

Categories
Other

Answer each question in detail. each question should be roughly 150-250 words pe

Answer each question in detail. each question should be roughly 150-250 words per answer. This is a take home quiz so only the book is needed. No sources required in the answers.
02. Describe some of the various biomechanical principles involved in activities that various populations of people might utilize to develop fitness.
03. Discuss the differences between linear, angular, and general motion and how they all relate to sports.
04. Explain Newton’s three laws of motion as they apply to angular motion and give examples in sport.

Categories
Ecology

Watch (5-10 mins): Learn about 22-year-old Amanda Gorman (Links to an external

Watch (5-10 mins): Learn about 22-year-old Amanda Gorman (Links to an external site.) (PBS NewsHour), who read her poem at the inauguration. Amanda Gorman read her poem “The Hill We Climb” during the inaugural events The First Lady Dr. Jill Biden is a fan of Amanda’s poetry. (Links to an external site.)
You can also watch Gorman delivering her inaugural poem below, and read a copy of it here (Links to an external site.).
https://youtu.be/LZ055ilIiN4 (Links to an external site.)
As you watch, think about the following questions and jot down notes:
What do you notice?
What do you wonder?
What stands out to you?
Does any of the poem or the author herself resonate with you?
In an interview with The New York Times (Links to an external site.), Gorman said, “Now more than ever, the United States needs an inaugural poem. Poetry is typically the touchstone that we go back to when we have to remind ourselves of the history that we stand on, and the future that we stand for.” What do you think she means? How does poetry capture our feelings or attitudes in a way that traditional speeches or prose does not?
Free Write/Free Response: Choose one.
Write your own three line poem in reply to Gorman’s poem “ Choose a line, a vibe or a moment from the poem to inspire your response.”
Stream of consciousness: Capture your vibe or feeling from the poem in one word immediately after viewing.
Please share your observations, and discuss your thoughts with your peers. One way to think about the lines in the poem is to have a conversation with them. What would you say?
Review the Earth Charter I. Respect and Care for the Community of Life. Carefully connect at least three of the principles with Gorman’s ideas.
How does the poem weave in the concepts of respect, compassion, and empathy?
From items #1-6 above develop a discussion post around these activities and be sure to respond to at least three of your peers. Include some type of media (video, photo, etc.) to enhance your discussion post and connect to your ideas or advance the discussion.
You will be graded on quality and relevance, critical thinking, contribution, course connections, professional writing and media included. Please review the grading rubric for more details. The assignment should demonstrate at least 2 hours of work.
Discussions are an opportunity for reflection on your own thoughts, beliefs, questions, and/or concerns regarding a particular topic, issue, or experience. It is a reflection of your learning in the course and a record of your journey through the semester, not a diary. The ultimate purpose of discussions are to provide you with a place to express your ideas and opinions and to facilitate discussion between you and your classmates. Expect each discussion to take 1-2 hours to complete along with 2-3 hours to complete any required readings.
You will be graded on six criteria: quality and relevance, critical thinking, contribution to peers, course connections, writing, and media included
Post your response to the discussion prompt below along with photos, videos, links, or interesting things that relate to the discussion or enhance your thoughts. To size photos properly, please refer to the tutorials about image resizing in the Canvas Student Demonstration Course: https://fgcu.instructure.com/courses/7692
You must post first before you can see your other classmates’ posts.
Read and respond to at least three of your fellow classmates’ postings.
All work reflected in the discussion should be in your own words. If you use other authors’ works you need to properly cite and reference the information including photos, drawings, graphics and/external links.
A great discussion is one that addresses the questions in the prompt while making connections to additional course materials, readings, and experiences. The ability to incorporate these concepts shows a high degree of critical thinking.
You are encouraged to share things from your life, experiences, material learned in other courses or your major and any additional thoughts you have on the prompt. This demonstrates that you are truly reflecting on the topic.
Be detailed and give reasoning behind your thoughts. For example – don’t just say “this place is great!” Tell me why it is great, what led you to your conclusions and ideas about the area.
LINKS TO WATCH/READ
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/poet-tapped-for-inauguration-to-spread-a-message-of-unity
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/books/story/2021-01-17/amanda-gorman-biden-inauguration-poet

Categories
Religious studies

I am attaching the instructions. I need 4-5 pages on symbolism in world religion

I am attaching the instructions. I need 4-5 pages on symbolism in world religions. I chose “Doctrine of Original Sin and Grace (origin of concepts and importance to Christianity)”
MUST USE FOOTNOTES

Categories
Education

PLEASE EDIT THE PROBLEM NEEDS ACTION PLAN. I ALSO ATTACHED THE PROBLEM NEEDS ASS

PLEASE EDIT THE PROBLEM NEEDS ACTION PLAN. I ALSO ATTACHED THE PROBLEM NEEDS ASSESSMENT TO HELP. PLEASE PLEASE READ… PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED PROBLEM NEEDS ASSESSMENT. THIS IS A DOCTORAL LEVEL ASSIGNMENT. I NEED IT TO PASS IRB THIS TIME. THIS IS MY THIRD ATTEMPT. THE CHANGES MUST BE CLEAR AND PRECISE. NOTHING SHOULD BE LEFT FOR GUESSING. ONLY LOOK AT THE AUGUST 17TH COMMENTS ONLY THROUGHOUT PAPER. PLEASE MAKE ALL NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS.

Categories
Other

Summarized paper regarding principles of Public Administration. And use WIC as t

Summarized paper regarding principles of Public Administration. And use WIC as the government agency using the directions on the attached forms.

Categories
Homeland Security

People’s Republic of China (PRC) Threat Analysis Type: This assignment consists

People’s Republic of China (PRC) Threat Analysis
Type: This assignment consists of a research analysis paper approximately five to seven pages in length, double-spaced (This page count does not include a title page, abstract (optional), table of contents (optional), bibliography page(s), or Endnotes page(s) (if used)). The source material should result primarily from self-led external research of scholarly articles. In addition, the course required reading materials may be used. The paper should have 5 to 7 pages of content which are the written results of your research efforts.Topic:
The final research essay for this course is to review the results of the Cox Committee investigation by Congress into the threat posed by the PRC. This report was prepared by the House of Representatives with input from the Intelligence Community (IC) and the Congressional Research Service (CRS). It represents an outstanding counterintelligence analysis product. The complete report is posted under the Resources in the “Cox Report – US Natl Scty and Mil-Commercial Concerns with PRC – 1999” folder. (As a backup, the Govt Printing Office link for this report is http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CRPT-105hrpt851/content-detail.html)
Your assignment starts with a review of the Cox Report (start early — it is long) to determine the descriiptive, explanatory, and predictive analytical methods used by Cox Committee, IC, and CRS to develop the report’s conclusions on the PRC’s intelligence threat. Your assignment is to describe the various analytical methods used. Your descriiption of the methods used should be supported by examples from the Cox Report. Finally, your assignment must include a discussion of the policy and operational decisions made as a result of this counterintelligence analysis of the PRC’s threat.
The purpose of this assignment is for you to understand how counterintelligence analysis is applied.
Note: Per the original course author, this course was designed as follow-on to the INTL300 Research Methods. Thus, you were supposed to bring the knowledge of the three analytical methods mentioned above with you from taking INTL300 earlier/previously. However, if you are not familiar with these methods, I am posting in the class’ Resources a CIA reference document titled, “Tradecraft Primer – Structured Analytic Techniques for Improving Intelligence Analysis,” dated Apr 2009. Please feel free to use the three previously mentioned methods in the assignment, if you are familiar with them, or any one or combination of methods from this primer.
Format: Your paper requires a Title page, citations, and a bibliography. Your paper should be in the Chicago format (http://www.apus.edu/Online-Library/tutorials/chicago.htm)

Categories
Other

Health Promotion and Illness Prevention Students will Create an Infographic on t

Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
Students will Create an Infographic on the topic of Telehealth: Health Promotion and Illness Prevention. The Health Promotion and illness prevention infographic MUST easily understood by the lay public or general population. The infographic should provide information useful to communicating the “What, Why, When and How” of Telehealth.
Citations: At least one high-level scholarly reference in APA per post from within the last 5 years as required by APA 7th ed.

Categories
Nursing

1. Watch Say This, Not That: Patient Experience Video (16:07), and take notes re

1. Watch Say This, Not That: Patient Experience Video (16:07), and take notes responding to the video’s prompts.
2. Create an initial post that addresses the following in a maximum of 3 paragraphs:
* Summarize your responses you noted about the video prompts.
* Your post should include some type of reference/relationship/comparison for the context.
Link to watch video ;